You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measurement of the frequency and source of interruptions occurring during bedside nursing handover in the intensive care unit: An observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses., May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.aucc.2014.04.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy J. Spooner, Amanda Corley, Wendy Chaboyer, Naomi E. Hammond, John F. Fraser |
| Abstract |
Effective clinical handover involves the communication of relevant patient information from one care provider to another and is critical in ensuring patient safety. Interruptions may contribute to errors and are potentially a significant barrier to the delivery of effective handovers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 26% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,276,973
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses.
#551
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,019
of 241,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses.
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.