You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variability in Working Memory Performance Explained by Epistasis vs Polygenic Scores in the ZNF804A Pathway
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Psychiatry, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.528 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin K. Nicodemus, April Hargreaves, Derek Morris, Richard Anney, Michael Gill, Aiden Corvin, Gary Donohoe |
| Abstract |
We investigated the variation in neuropsychological function explained by risk alleles at the psychosis susceptibility gene ZNF804A and its interacting partners using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), polygenic scores, and epistatic analyses. Of particular importance was the relative contribution of the polygenic score vs epistasis in variation explained. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Denmark | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Professor | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 18% |
| Psychology | 33 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 65 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,004,293
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#4,937
of 5,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,072
of 243,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#49
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.