| Title |
Does Use of a Powered Ankle‐foot Prosthesis Restore Whole‐body Angular Momentum During Walking at Different Speeds?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-014-3647-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan D’Andrea, Natalie Wilhelm, Anne K. Silverman, Alena M. Grabowski |
| Abstract |
Whole-body angular momentum (H) influences fall risk, is tightly regulated during walking, and is primarily controlled by muscle force generation. People with transtibial amputations using passive-elastic prostheses typically have greater H compared with nonamputees. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 134 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 40 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,278,028
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,329
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,207
of 265,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#56
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.