↓ Skip to main content

Residual Deep Convolutional Neural Network Predicts MGMT Methylation Status

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
8 patents
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Residual Deep Convolutional Neural Network Predicts MGMT Methylation Status
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10278-017-0009-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiotis Korfiatis, Timothy L. Kline, Daniel H. Lachance, Ian F. Parney, Jan C. Buckner, Bradley J. Erickson

Abstract

Predicting methylation of the O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene status utilizing MRI imaging is of high importance since it is a predictor of response and prognosis in brain tumors. In this study, we compare three different residual deep neural network (ResNet) architectures to evaluate their ability in predicting MGMT methylation status without the need for a distinct tumor segmentation step. We found that the ResNet50 (50 layers) architecture was the best performing model, achieving an accuracy of 94.90% (+/- 3.92%) for the test set (classification of a slice as no tumor, methylated MGMT, or non-methylated). ResNet34 (34 layers) achieved 80.72% (+/- 13.61%) while ResNet18 (18 layers) accuracy was 76.75% (+/- 20.67%). ResNet50 performance was statistically significantly better than both ResNet18 and ResNet34 architectures (p < 0.001). We report a method that alleviates the need of extensive preprocessing and acts as a proof of concept that deep neural architectures can be used to predict molecular biomarkers from routine medical images.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 55 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Computer Science 20 13%
Engineering 18 12%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 73 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,443,731
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
#15
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,707
of 328,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them