| Title |
A germline missense mutation in exon 3 of the MSH2 gene in a Lynch syndrome family: correlation with phenotype and localization assay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Familial Cancer, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10689-017-0030-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesca Bianchi, Elena Maccaroni, Laura Belvederesi, Cristiana Brugiati, Riccardo Giampieri, Federica Bini, Raffaella Bracci, Silvia Pagliaretta, Michela Del Prete, Francesco Piva, Alessandra Mandolesi, Marina Scarpelli, Rossana Berardi |
| Abstract |
Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations in any of the MisMatch Repair (MMR) genes. About 37% of MSH2 variants are missense variants causing single amino-acid substitutions. Whether missense variants affect the normal function of MMR proteins is crucial both to provide affected families a more accurate risk assessment and to offer predictive testing to family members. Here we report one family, fulfilling both Amsterdam I and II criteria and Bethesda guidelines, referred to our center for genetic counselling. The proband and some of her relatives have been investigated for microsatellite instability (MSI), immunohistochemical MMR protein staining, direct sequencing and Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). Also Subcellular Localization Assay and Splice site predictions analyses were used. A germline missense variant of uncertain significance (exon 3, p.Val161Asp) was found in MSH2 gene in proband and in some relatives. The variant was associated with lack of expression of MSH2 protein (DMMR) and MSI-High status in tumour tissues. The localization assay of the MSH2 protein showed an abnormal subcellular localization pattern of the corresponding protein. Finally, splice-site prediction analysis ruled out a potential role of new splice sites as the cause behind the lack of expression of MSH2 protein and we suppose a potential correlation with other forms of post-transcriptional regulation (circular RNAs). The variant here reported shows a high correlation with phenotype and is located in an evolutionary conserved domain. The localization assay also suggest a potential pathogenic role, thus supporting further research on this matter. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.
All research outputs
#20,441,465
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Familial Cancer
#489
of 567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,181
of 317,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Familial Cancer
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 567 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.