↓ Skip to main content

A more realistic disc herniation model incorporating compression, flexion and facet-constrained shear: a mechanical and microstructural analysis. Part I: Low rate loading

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
A more realistic disc herniation model incorporating compression, flexion and facet-constrained shear: a mechanical and microstructural analysis. Part I: Low rate loading
Published in
European Spine Journal, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00586-017-5252-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly R. Wade, Meredith L. Schollum, Peter A. Robertson, Ashvin Thambyah, Neil D. Broom

Abstract

To date, the mechanisms of disc failure have been explored at a microstructural level in relatively simple postures. However, in vivo the disc is known to be subjected to complex loading in compression, bending and shear, and the influence of these factors on the mechanisms of disc failure is yet to be described at a microstructural level. The purpose of this study was to provide a microstructural analysis of the mechanisms of failure in healthy discs subjected to compression while held in a complex posture incorporating physiological amounts of flexion and facet-constrained shear. 30 motion segments from 10 healthy mature ovine lumbar spines were compressed in a complex posture intended to simulate the situation arising when bending and twisting while lifting a heavy object, and at a displacement rate of 40 mm/min. Nine of the 30 samples reached the predetermined displacement prior to a reduction in load and were classified as early-stage failures, providing insight into initial areas of disc disruption. Both groups of damaged discs were then analysed microstructurally using light microscopy. Complex postures significantly reduced the load required to cause disc failure than earlier described for flexed postures [8.42 kN (STD 1.22 kN) compared to 9.69 kN (STD 2.56 kN)] and resulted in a very different failure morphology to that observed in either simple flexion or direct compression, involving infiltration of nucleus material in a circuitous path to the annular periphery. The complex posture as used in this study significantly reduced the load required to cause disc failure, providing further evidence that asymmetric postures while lifting should be avoided if possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Other 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,113,373
of 25,211,948 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#182
of 5,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,479
of 323,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,211,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.