↓ Skip to main content

Addressing problems with replicability and validity of repository mining studies through a smart data platform

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Addressing problems with replicability and validity of repository mining studies through a smart data platform
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10664-017-9537-x
Authors

Fabian Trautsch, Steffen Herbold, Philip Makedonski, Jens Grabowski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Other 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 24 44%
Engineering 5 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Chemistry 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2019.
All research outputs
#12,991,296
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#345
of 707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,084
of 317,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 707 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.