| Title |
Adam Smith’s Theory of Prudence Updated with Neuroscientific and Behavioral Evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-017-9332-9 |
| Authors |
Eleonora Viganò |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,193,557
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#249
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,865
of 309,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.