↓ Skip to main content

Frozen tissue preparation for high-resolution multiplex histological analyses of human brain specimens

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Frozen tissue preparation for high-resolution multiplex histological analyses of human brain specimens
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11060-017-2547-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fangjie Shao, Wenhong Jiang, Qingqing Gao, Baizhou Li, Chongran Sun, Qiyuan Wang, Qin Chen, Bing Sun, Hong Shen, Keqing Zhu, Jianmin Zhang, Chong Liu

Abstract

The availability of a comprehensive tissue library is essential for elucidating the function and pathology of human brains. Considering the irreplaceable status of the formalin-fixation-paraffin-embedding (FFPE) preparation in routine pathology and the advantage of ultra-low temperature to preserve nucleic acids and proteins for multi-omics studies, these methods have become major modalities for the construction of brain tissue libraries. Nevertheless, the use of FFPE and snap-frozen samples is limited in high-resolution histological analyses because the preparation destroys tissue integrity and/or many important cellular markers. To overcome these limitations, we detailed a protocol to prepare and analyze frozen human brain samples that is particularly suitable for high-resolution multiplex immunohistological studies. As an alternative, we offered an optimized procedure to rescue snap-frozen tissues for the same purpose. Importantly, we provided a guideline to construct libraries of frozen tissue with minimal effort, cost and space. Taking advantage of this new tissue preparation modality to nicely preserve the cellular information that was otherwise damaged using conventional methods and to effectively remove tissue autofluorescence, we described the high-resolution landscape of the cellular composition in both lower-grade gliomas and glioblastoma multiforme samples. Our work showcases the great value of fixed frozen tissue in understanding the cellular mechanisms of CNS functions and abnormalities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,474,679
of 22,997,543 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,971
of 2,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,446
of 318,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#27
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,986 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.