↓ Skip to main content

Nutrient Retention and the Problem of Hydrologic Disconnection in Streams and Wetlands

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Nutrient Retention and the Problem of Hydrologic Disconnection in Streams and Wetlands
Published in
Ecosystems, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10021-012-9520-8
Authors

Stephen M. Powers, Robert A. Johnson, Emily H. Stanley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 23%
Student > Master 21 17%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 63 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 8%
Engineering 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#704
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,372
of 169,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.