↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of physicochemical pretreatments of banana peels for bioethanol production

Overview of attention for article published in Food Science and Biotechnology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of physicochemical pretreatments of banana peels for bioethanol production
Published in
Food Science and Biotechnology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10068-017-0128-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sócrates Palacios, Héctor A. Ruiz, Rodolfo Ramos-Gonzalez, José Martínez, Elda Segura, Miguel Aguilar, Antonio Aguilera, Georgina Michelena, Cristóbal Aguilar, Anna Ilyina

Abstract

Pretreatments with different concentrations of sulfuric acid (0, 0.5, and 1% v/v) and temperatures (28 and 121 °C at 103 kPa in an autoclave) were performed on banana peels (BP) milled by mechanical grinding and grinding in a blender as well as without grinding. Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, ash, and total and reducing sugar contents were evaluated. The highest yields of cellulose enzymatic hydrolysis (99%) were achieved with liquefied autoclaved BP treated with 0.5 and 1% acid after 48 h of hydrolysis. Ethanol production by Kluyveromyces marxianus fermentation was assayed using hydrolyzed BP at 10, 15, and 20% (w/w). The highest ethanol level (21 g/L) was reached after 24 h of fermentation with 20% (w/w) BP. Kinetics of the consumption of reducing sugars under this fermentation condition demonstrates the presence of a lag period (about 8 h). Thus, BP are a good source for ethanol production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 54 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 17 13%
Engineering 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Energy 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 61 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2021.
All research outputs
#14,297,409
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Food Science and Biotechnology
#213
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,335
of 316,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Science and Biotechnology
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.