↓ Skip to main content

Injuries among male and female elite football players

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Injuries among male and female elite football players
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, November 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00861.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Hägglund, M. Waldén, J. Ekstrand

Abstract

All 12 female football clubs (228 players) and 11 of 14 male clubs (239 players) in the Swedish premier league were followed prospectively during the 2005 season. Individual exposure (playing time), injuries (time loss), and injury severity (days lost due to injury) were recorded by the team medical staffs. Injury incidence was higher for male players during both training (4.7 vs 3.8 injuries/1000 h, P=0.018) and match play (28.1 vs 16.1, P<0.001). However, no difference was found in the incidence of severe injury (absence >4 weeks) (0.7/1000 h in both groups). The thigh, especially the hamstrings, was the overall most commonly injured region in both sexes, while the hip/groin was more commonly injured in male players and the knee in female players. Knee ligament injuries accounted for 31% and 37% of the total time lost from football for male and female players, respectively. In conclusion, male elite players had a higher injury incidence than their female counterparts although no difference was observed in the incidence of moderate to severe injury. We recommend that preventive measures should be focused on hamstring and knee ligament injury in order to reduce the overall injury burden.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 439 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 20%
Student > Bachelor 83 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 10%
Student > Postgraduate 31 7%
Researcher 29 6%
Other 66 15%
Unknown 107 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 144 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 99 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 9%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Psychology 6 1%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 121 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,913,730
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#949
of 3,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,832
of 185,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.