↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Disease-Modifying Therapies for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Relapse Rates from US Insurance Claims Data

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics - Open, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Disease-Modifying Therapies for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Relapse Rates from US Insurance Claims Data
Published in
PharmacoEconomics - Open, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s41669-017-0035-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Nicholas, Aaron Boster, Ning Wu, Wei-Shi Yeh, Monica Fay, Jon Kendter, Ming-Yi Huang, Andrew Lee

Abstract

Data on comparative healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with the newer oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for managing relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in routine clinical practice are limited. The purpose of this study was to estimate healthcare resource utilization, costs, and relapse rates in the year after initiating treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF), interferon (IFN)-β, glatiramer acetate (GA), teriflunomide, or fingolimod in routine clinical practice for patients with MS who did not receive a DMT in the previous year. Patients initiating DMF, IFNβ, GA, teriflunomide, or fingolimod were identified based on claims data from 2012 to 2015 in the Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims Databases (n = 4194). Healthcare resource utilization assessment included the proportion of patients who were hospitalized, or had emergency room (ER) or urgent care (UC) visits. Healthcare costs were estimated for 1 year before and 1 year after DMT initiation. Relapse episodes were identified based on a published claims-based algorithm and clinical input from the research investigators. After DMT initiation, significant reductions in the proportions of patients who were hospitalized or requiring ER/UC visits were observed in all patient cohorts (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Non-prescription medical costs decreased after DMT initiation, with the largest decrease observed in the DMF cohort (US$5761 reduction, p < 0.0001). Reductions in non-prescription medical costs were associated with decreased use of outpatient services and inpatient hospital stays, and have the potential to partially offset DMT costs. DMT initiation is associated with reductions in healthcare resource utilization and non-prescription medical costs in routine clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,133,441
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics - Open
#54
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,697
of 318,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics - Open
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.