Title |
Do women with pelvic floor dysfunction referred by gynaecologists and urologists at hospitals complete a pelvic floor muscle training programme? A retrospective study, 1992–2008
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00192-012-2018-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sigrid Tibaek, Christian Dehlendorff |
Abstract |
For decades women with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) have been referred to pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), but there is only little information on whether the women complete the programmes and why. The objectives of this study were to investigate to which extent women completed a PFMT programme to which they were referred by gynaecologists and urologists and to identify associated factors for completion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 38 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 17% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 43 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1,978
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,688
of 289,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#25
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.