You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Successes and Failures of Pay for Performance in the United Kingdom
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmhpr1316051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Beth Hamel, Martin Roland, Stephen Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 16% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 40% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 14% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 48 | 24% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#952,693
of 25,448,590 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#9,366
of 32,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,029
of 241,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#116
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,448,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.