↓ Skip to main content

Dissociative identity disorder: An empirical overview

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 2,520)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
16 Google+ users
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
589 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dissociative identity disorder: An empirical overview
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, May 2014
DOI 10.1177/0004867414527523
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin J Dorahy, Bethany L Brand, Vedat Şar, Christa Krüger, Pam Stavropoulos, Alfonso Martínez-Taboas, Roberto Lewis-Fernández, Warwick Middleton

Abstract

Despite its long and auspicious place in the history of psychiatry, dissociative identity disorder (DID) has been associated with controversy. This paper aims to examine the empirical data related to DID and outline the contextual challenges to its scientific investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 589 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 582 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 165 28%
Student > Master 68 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 7%
Researcher 36 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 5%
Other 98 17%
Unknown 151 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 247 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 66 11%
Social Sciences 26 4%
Neuroscience 24 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 2%
Other 53 9%
Unknown 161 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#411,186
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#39
of 2,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,478
of 242,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.