↓ Skip to main content

Syringe Exchange in the United States: A National Level Economic Evaluation of Hypothetical Increases in Investment

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 3,691)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
27 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Syringe Exchange in the United States: A National Level Economic Evaluation of Hypothetical Increases in Investment
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10461-014-0789-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trang Quynh Nguyen, Brian W. Weir, Don C. Des Jarlais, Steven D. Pinkerton, David R. Holtgrave

Abstract

To examine whether increasing investment in needle/syringe exchange programs (NSPs) in the US would be cost-effective for HIV prevention, we modeled HIV incidence in hypothetical cases with higher NSP syringe supply than current levels, and estimated number of infections averted, cost per infection averted, treatment costs saved, and financial return on investment. We modified Pinkerton's model, which was an adaptation of Kaplan's simplified needle circulation theory model, to compare different syringe supply levels, account for syringes from non-NSP sources, and reflect reduction in syringe sharing and contamination. With an annual $10 to $50 million funding increase, 194-816 HIV infections would be averted (cost per infection averted $51,601-$61,302). Contrasted with HIV treatment cost savings alone, the rate of financial return on investment would be 7.58-6.38. Main and sensitivity analyses strongly suggest that it would be cost-saving for the US to invest in syringe exchange expansion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 32%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 22%
Social Sciences 15 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 304. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#114,490
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#9
of 3,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#863
of 241,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.