↓ Skip to main content

Luck, blame, and desert

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Luck, blame, and desert
Published in
Philosophical Studies, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11098-013-0183-x
Authors

Michael Cholbi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 67%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,301,167
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#680
of 1,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,911
of 197,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.