↓ Skip to main content

A replication study confirms the association of GWAS-identified SNPs at MICB and PLCE1in Thai patients with dengue shock syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
A replication study confirms the association of GWAS-identified SNPs at MICB and PLCE1in Thai patients with dengue shock syndrome
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2350-15-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tran Ngoc Dang, Izumi Naka, Areerat Sa-Ngasang, Surapee Anantapreecha, Sumalee Chanama, Nuanjun Wichukchinda, Pathom Sawanpanyalert, Jintana Patarapotikul, Naoyuki Tsuchiya, Jun Ohashi

Abstract

Dengue shock syndrome (DSS), a severe life-threatening form of dengue infection, mostly occurs in children. A recent genome wide association study (GWAS) identified two SNPs, rs3132468 of major histocompatibility complex class I polypeptide-related sequence B (MICB) and rs3765524 of phospholipase C, epsilon 1 (PLCE1), associated with DSS in Vietnamese children. In this study, to examine whether an identical association is found in a different population, the association of these two SNPs with DSS was assessed in Thai children with dengue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#1,682
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,366
of 241,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#29
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.