| Title |
Learning from the UK’s research impact assessment exercise: a case study of a retrospective impact assessment exercise and questions for the future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Technology Transfer, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10961-017-9608-6 |
| Authors |
Molly Morgan Jones, Catriona Manville, Joanna Chataway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 26% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,597,055
of 23,302,246 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#102
of 591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,856
of 318,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,302,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 591 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.