↓ Skip to main content

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing remifentanil with fentanyl in mechanically ventilated patients

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing remifentanil with fentanyl in mechanically ventilated patients
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00134-010-2100-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Spies, Martin MacGuill, Anja Heymann, Christina Ganea, Daniel Krahne, Angelika Assman, Heinrich-Rudolf Kosiek, Kathrin Scholtz, Klaus-Dieter Wernecke, Jörg Martin

Abstract

To compare the quality of analgesia provided by a remifentanil-based analgesia regime with that provided by a fentanyl-based regime in critically ill patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Italy 2 2%
France 1 1%
Bulgaria 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Other 14 15%
Student > Postgraduate 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor 7 7%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 66%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,140,543
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,549
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,733
of 171,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.