↓ Skip to main content

Improved Prognosis for Older Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved Prognosis for Older Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 2010
DOI 10.1200/jco.2010.32.0325
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ching-Hon Pui, Deqing Pei, Dario Campana, W. Paul Bowman, John T. Sandlund, Sue C. Kaste, Raul C. Ribeiro, Jeffrey E. Rubnitz, Elaine Coustan-Smith, Sima Jeha, Cheng Cheng, Monika L. Metzger, Deepa Bhojwani, Hiroto Inaba, Susana C. Raimondi, Mihaela Onciu, Scott C. Howard, Wing Leung, James R. Downing, William E. Evans, Mary V. Relling

Abstract

The prognosis for older adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been historically much worse than that for younger patients. We reviewed the outcome of older adolescents (age 15 to 18 years) treated in four consecutive Total Therapy studies to determine if recent improved treatment extended to this high-risk group.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 133 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 13 9%
Professor 12 9%
Other 44 31%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 23 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2011.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#18,604
of 22,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,541
of 192,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#123
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.