You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whole-exome sequencing and clinical interpretation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples to guide precision cancer medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nm.3559 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eliezer M Van Allen, Nikhil Wagle, Petar Stojanov, Danielle L Perrin, Kristian Cibulskis, Sara Marlow, Judit Jane-Valbuena, Dennis C Friedrich, Gregory Kryukov, Scott L Carter, Aaron McKenna, Andrey Sivachenko, Mara Rosenberg, Adam Kiezun, Douglas Voet, Michael Lawrence, Lee T Lichtenstein, Jeff G Gentry, Franklin W Huang, Jennifer Fostel, Deborah Farlow, David Barbie, Leena Gandhi, Eric S Lander, Stacy W Gray, Steven Joffe, Pasi Janne, Judy Garber, Laura MacConaill, Neal Lindeman, Barrett Rollins, Philip Kantoff, Sheila A Fisher, Stacey Gabriel, Gad Getz, Levi A Garraway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 29 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 25 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 705 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 672 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 175 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 137 | 19% |
| Other | 78 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 8% |
| Professor | 38 | 5% |
| Other | 126 | 18% |
| Unknown | 98 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 197 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 166 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 127 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 30 | 4% |
| Engineering | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 50 | 7% |
| Unknown | 122 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#729,910
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#2,071
of 9,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,599
of 242,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#20
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.