↓ Skip to main content

Does self-monitoring reduce blood pressure? Meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Medicine, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does self-monitoring reduce blood pressure? Meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Annals of Medicine, May 2010
DOI 10.3109/07853890.2010.489567
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma P. Bray, Roger Holder, Jonathan Mant, Richard J. McManus

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) is an increasingly common part of hypertension management. The objectives of this systematic review were to evaluate the systolic and diastolic BP reduction, and achievement of target BP, associated with self-monitoring.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Professor 8 5%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 37%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 42 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,071,763
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Medicine
#61
of 1,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,327
of 95,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Medicine
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.