| Title |
Designing and recasting LHC analyses with MadAnalysis 5
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The European Physical Journal C, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3103-0 |
| Authors |
Eric Conte, Béranger Dumont, Benjamin Fuks, Chris Wymant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 39% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 26 | 79% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,970,494
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal C
#5,333
of 9,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,346
of 268,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal C
#78
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.