| Title |
The Cool Little Kids randomised controlled trial: Population-level early prevention for anxiety disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordana K Bayer, Ronald M Rapee, Harriet Hiscock, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Susan Clifford, Melissa Wake |
| Abstract |
The World Health Organization predicts that by 2030 internalising problems (e.g. depression and anxiety) will be second only to HIV/AIDS in international burden of disease. Internalising problems affect 1 in 7 school aged children, impacting on peer relations, school engagement, and later mental health, relationships and employment. The development of early childhood prevention for internalising problems is in its infancy. The current study follows two successful 'efficacy' trials of a parenting group intervention to reduce internalising disorders in temperamentally inhibited preschool children. Cool Little Kids is a population-level randomised trial to determine the impacts of systematically screening preschoolers for inhibition then offering a parenting group intervention, on child internalising problems and economic costs at school entry. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 258 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 19% |
| Researcher | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 99 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2011.
All research outputs
#15,233,109
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,233
of 14,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,035
of 180,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#96
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.