↓ Skip to main content

Task‐specific Fall Prevention Training Is Effective for Warfighters With Transtibial Amputations

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
Title
Task‐specific Fall Prevention Training Is Effective for Warfighters With Transtibial Amputations
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-3664-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenton R. Kaufman, Marilynn P. Wyatt, Pinata H. Sessoms, Mark D. Grabiner

Abstract

Key factors limiting patients with lower extremity amputations to achieve maximal functional capabilities are falls and fear of falling. A task-specific fall prevention training program has successfully reduced prospectively recorded trip-related falls that occur in the community by the elderly. However, this program has not been tested in amputees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 323 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 18%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 10%
Researcher 29 9%
Other 17 5%
Other 64 20%
Unknown 88 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 14%
Engineering 35 11%
Sports and Recreations 27 8%
Unspecified 14 4%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 107 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,925
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,836
of 265,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#32
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.