| Title |
Knowledge typologies for professional learning: educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational technology research and development, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-017-9536-z |
| Authors |
Nina Hood, Allison Littlejohn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 41% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 23% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,893,516
of 25,035,235 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#73
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,149
of 323,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,035,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.