↓ Skip to main content

Biophilia on the Dinner Plate: a Conversation about Ethics and Entomophagy

Overview of attention for article published in Food Ethics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Biophilia on the Dinner Plate: a Conversation about Ethics and Entomophagy
Published in
Food Ethics, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s41055-017-0015-3
Authors

David Waltner-Toews, Karen Houle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 21%
Social Sciences 2 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#14,250,824
of 25,157,832 outputs
Outputs from Food Ethics
#47
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,891
of 324,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Ethics
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,157,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.