You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69121-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean Bourhis, Jens Overgaard, Hélène Audry, Kian K Ang, Michele Saunders, Jacques Bernier, Jean-Claude Horiot, Aurélie Le Maître, Thomas F Pajak, Michael G Poulsen, Brian O'Sullivan, Werner Dobrowsky, Andrzej Hliniak, Krzysztof Skladowski, John H Hay, Luiz HJ Pinto, Carlo Fallai, Karen K Fu, Richard Sylvester, Jean-Pierre Pignon, on behalf of the Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and neck Collaborative Group |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 451 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 82 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 14% |
| Other | 58 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 44 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 8% |
| Other | 116 | 24% |
| Unknown | 68 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 288 | 61% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 3% |
| Engineering | 10 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 6% |
| Unknown | 105 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,201,922
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#13,259
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,503
of 89,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#32
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.