↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous Drainage versus Emergency Cholecystectomy for the Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis in Critically Ill Patients: Does it Matter?

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous Drainage versus Emergency Cholecystectomy for the Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis in Critically Ill Patients: Does it Matter?
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00268-011-0985-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Melloul, A. Denys, N. Demartines, J.‐M. Calmes, M. Schäfer

Abstract

The aim if this study was to compare percutaneous drainage (PD) of the gallbladder to emergency cholecystectomy (EC) in a well-defined patient group with sepsis related to acute calculous/acalculous cholecystitis (ACC/AAC).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2011.
All research outputs
#15,233,109
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,021
of 4,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,068
of 184,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#24
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.