↓ Skip to main content

Costs of reproduction in a long-lived female primate: injury risk and wound healing

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Costs of reproduction in a long-lived female primate: injury risk and wound healing
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00265-014-1729-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Archie, Jeanne Altmann, Susan C. Alberts

Abstract

Reproduction is a notoriously costly phase of life, exposing individuals to injury, infectious disease, and energetic tradeoffs. The strength of these costs should be influenced by life history strategies, and in long-lived species, females may be selected to mitigate costs of reproduction because life span is such an important component of their reproductive success. Here we report evidence for two costs of reproduction that may influence survival in wild female baboons-injury risk and delayed wound healing. Based on 29 years of observations in the Amboseli ecosystem, Kenya, we found that wild female baboons experienced the highest risk of injury on days when they were most likely to be ovulating. In addition, lactating females healed from wounds more slowly than pregnant or cycling females, indicating a possible tradeoff between lactation and immune function. We also found variation in injury risk and wound healing with dominance rank and age: older and low-status females were more likely to be injured than younger or high-status females, and older females exhibited slower healing than younger females. Our results support the idea that wild non-human primates experience energetic and immune costs of reproduction, and they help illuminate life history tradeoffs in long-lived species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Unknown 131 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 50%
Environmental Science 10 7%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#724,773
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#103
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,127
of 228,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.