↓ Skip to main content

Extending JAGS: A tutorial on adding custom distributions to JAGS (with a diffusion model example)

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Extending JAGS: A tutorial on adding custom distributions to JAGS (with a diffusion model example)
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, August 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13428-013-0369-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominik Wabersich, Joachim Vandekerckhove

Abstract

We demonstrate how to add a custom distribution into the general-purpose, open-source, cross-platform graphical modeling package JAGS ("Just Another Gibbs Sampler"). JAGS is intended to be modular and extensible, and modules written in the way laid out here can be loaded at runtime as needed and do not interfere with regular JAGS functionality when not loaded. Writing custom extensions requires knowledge of C++, but installing a new module can be highly automatic, depending on the operating system. As a basic example, we implement a Bernoulli distribution in JAGS. We further present our implementation of the Wiener diffusion first-passage time distribution, which is freely available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/jags-wiener/ .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 2 1%
Switzerland 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 116 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 32%
Researcher 30 22%
Student > Master 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Mathematics 8 6%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Decision Sciences 4 3%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#1,037
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,183
of 210,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.