| Title |
The tight calorie control study (TICACOS): a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study of nutritional support in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-011-2146-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre Singer, Ronit Anbar, Jonathan Cohen, Haim Shapiro, Michal Shalita-Chesner, Shaul Lev, Elad Grozovski, Miryam Theilla, Sigal Frishman, Zecharia Madar |
| Abstract |
To determine whether nutritional support guided by repeated measurements of resting energy requirements improves the outcome of critically ill patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 360 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 90 | 24% |
| Unknown | 62 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 212 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Unknown | 79 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,655,162
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,001
of 5,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,674
of 107,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.