You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effective pulmonary delivery of an aerosolized plasmid DNA vaccine via surface acoustic wave nebulization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-15-60 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anushi E Rajapaksa, Jenny J Ho, Aisha Qi, Rob Bischof, Tri-Hung Nguyen, Michelle Tate, David Piedrafita, Michelle P McIntosh, Leslie Y Yeo, Els Meeusen, Ross L Coppel, James R Friend |
| Abstract |
Pulmonary-delivered gene therapy promises to mitigate vaccine safety issues and reduce the need for needles and skilled personnel to use them. While plasmid DNA (pDNA) offers a rapid route to vaccine production without side effects or reliance on cold chain storage, its delivery to the lung has proved challenging. Conventional methods, including jet and ultrasonic nebulizers, fail to deliver large biomolecules like pDNA intact due to the shear and cavitational stresses present during nebulization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 25% |
| Researcher | 27 | 24% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 30 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#437
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,792
of 240,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.