| Title |
Nuclear accumulation of polyglutamine disease proteins and neuropathology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Brain, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-6606-2-21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren S Havel, Shihua Li, Xiao-Jiang Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,384,080
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Brain
#82
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,637
of 110,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Brain
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them