| Title |
Severe Hemorrhagic Shock Leads to a Delayed Fracture Healing and Decreased Bone Callus Strength in a Mouse Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-017-5473-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrin Bundkirchen, Christian Macke, Janin Reifenrath, Luisa Marilena Schäck, Sandra Noack, Borna Relja, Philipp Naber, Bastian Welke, Michael Fehr, Christian Krettek, Claudia Neunaber |
| Abstract |
Multiple trauma is frequently associated with hemorrhagic shock and fractures of the extremities. Clinically, the rate of impaired fracture healing (delayed healing and nonunion) seems to be increased in patients with multiple injuries compared with patients with isolated fractures. As the underlying pathogenesis remains poorly understood, we aimed to analyze the biomechanical properties during fracture healing in a murine model. The aim of this study was to determine whether fracture healing after severe hemorrhagic shock results in (1) delayed bridging as determined by macroscopic and radiographic assessment, (2) altered conditions of callus components as determined by µCT, and (3) decreased maximum bending moment measured by a three-point-bending test compared with ordinary fracture healing. Male C57BL/6NCrl mice were randomly assigned to five groups and four different times (five to 10 mice per group and time). Only the right femur from each mouse was used for analysis: the trauma hemorrhage (TH) group received a pressure-controlled hemorrhagic shock via catheter; the osteotomy (Fx) group underwent osteotomy and implantation of an external fixator on the right femur; the combined trauma (THFx) group received hemorrhagic shock and an external fixator with osteotomy; the sham group underwent implantation of a catheter and external fixator but had no blood loss or osteotomy, and the control group underwent no interventions. After 2, 3, 4, or 6 weeks, five to 10 animals of each group were sacrificed. Bones were analyzed macroscopically and via radiographs, µCT, and three-point-bending test. Statistical significance was set at a probability less than 0.05. Comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U or the Kruskal-Wallis test. In the Fx group, the osteotomy gap was stable and bridged after 2 weeks in contrast to some bones in the THFx group where stable bridging did not occur. No difference was observed between the groups. µCT analysis showed reduced density of bone including callus (THFx: 1.17 g/cm(3); interquartile range [IQR], 0.04 g/cm(3); Fx: 1.22 g/cm(3); IQR, 0.04 g/cm(3); p = 0.002; difference of medians [DM], -0.048; 95% CI, -0.073 to -0.029) and increased share of callus per volume of bone mass (%) after 2 weeks in the THFx group compared with the Fx group (THFx: 44.16%; IQR, 8.66%; Fx: 36.73%; IQR, 4.39%; p = 0.015; DM, 7.634; 95% CI, 2.018-10.577). The three-point-bending test established a decreased maximum bending moment in the THFx group compared with the Fx group 2 weeks after surgery (THFx: 7.10 Nmm; IQR, 11.25 Nmm; Fx: 11.25 Nmm; IQR, 5.70 Nmm; p = 0.026; DM, -5.043; 95% CI, -10.867 to -0.74). No differences were observed between the THFx and Fx groups after more than 2 weeks. In this in vivo mouse fracture model, we conclude that hemorrhagic shock retards fracture healing during the early phase of the facture healing process. A severe hemorrhagic shock in patients could result in initial delayed fracture healing and needs special attention. We plan to conduct a prospective, observational clinical research study to analyze if delayed fracture healing occurs in patients after severe blood loss. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 47% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,523,434
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,850
of 7,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,158
of 327,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#33
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.