↓ Skip to main content

Reversible Pressure‐Controlled Depolymerization of a Copper(II)‐Containing Coordination Polymer

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - A European Journal, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reversible Pressure‐Controlled Depolymerization of a Copper(II)‐Containing Coordination Polymer
Published in
Chemistry - A European Journal, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/chem.201703115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack K. Clegg, Aidan J. Brock, Katrina A. Jolliffe, Leonard F. Lindoy, Simon Parsons, Peter A. Tasker, Fraser J. White

Abstract

A unique pressure-induced Cu-N bond breaking/bond forming reaction is reported. The variation of pressure on a single crystal of a one-dimensional copper(II)-containing coordination polymer (Cu2L2(1-methylpiperazine)2]n, where H2L is 1,1'-(1,3-phenylene)-bis(4,4-dimethylpentane-1,3-dione)), was monitored using single crystal X-ray diffraction with the aid of a diamond anvil cell. At a very low elevated pressure (~0.05 GPa) a remarkable reversible phase change was observed. The phase change results in the depolymerization of the material through the cleavage and formation of axial Cu-N bonds as well as "ring flips" of individual axially coordinated 1-methylpiperazine ligands. Overall, the pressure-induced phase change is associated with a surprising (and non-intuitive) shift in structure - from a 1-dimensional coordination polymer to a discrete dinuclear complex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 46%
Professor 3 23%
Researcher 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 54%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Materials Science 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,567,744
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#15,610
of 21,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,353
of 287,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#438
of 665 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,262 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 665 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.