↓ Skip to main content

Do stimulant medications improve educational and behavioral outcomes for children with ADHD?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Economics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 2,129)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
115 X users
facebook
15 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do stimulant medications improve educational and behavioral outcomes for children with ADHD?
Published in
Journal of Health Economics, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.05.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Currie, Mark Stabile, Lauren Jones

Abstract

We examine the effects of a policy change in the province of Quebec, Canada which greatly expanded insurance coverage for prescription medications. We show that the change was associated with a sharp increase in the use of stimulant medications commonly prescribed for ADHD in Quebec relative to the rest of Canada. We ask whether this increase in medication use was associated with improvements in emotional functioning or academic outcomes among children with ADHD. We find little evidence of improvement in either the medium or the long run. Our results are silent on the effects on optimal use of medication for ADHD, but suggest that expanding medication in a community setting had little positive benefit and may have had harmful effects given the average way these drugs are used in the community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 213 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 14%
Student > Master 27 12%
Researcher 26 12%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 22%
Social Sciences 33 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22 10%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 52 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#233,705
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Economics
#40
of 2,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,796
of 246,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Economics
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.