You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bisphosphonate Use and Atypical Fractures of the Femoral Shaft
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2011
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1010650 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jörg Schilcher, Karl Michaëlsson, Per Aspenberg |
Abstract |
Studies show conflicting results regarding the possible excess risk of atypical fractures of the femoral shaft associated with bisphosphonate use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 2% |
Japan | 3 | 1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 233 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 16% |
Other | 35 | 14% |
Researcher | 25 | 10% |
Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
Other | 62 | 25% |
Unknown | 45 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 44% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 6% |
Engineering | 14 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 8% |
Unknown | 62 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,498,093
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#11,812
of 32,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,068
of 126,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#81
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.