↓ Skip to main content

Bisphosphonate Use and Atypical Fractures of the Femoral Shaft

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
627 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bisphosphonate Use and Atypical Fractures of the Femoral Shaft
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2011
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1010650
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jörg Schilcher, Karl Michaëlsson, Per Aspenberg

Abstract

Studies show conflicting results regarding the possible excess risk of atypical fractures of the femoral shaft associated with bisphosphonate use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Japan 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 233 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 16%
Other 35 14%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Master 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 62 25%
Unknown 45 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 6%
Engineering 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 62 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,498,093
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#11,812
of 32,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,068
of 126,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#81
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.