↓ Skip to main content

Retrieval practice: the lack of transfer to deductive inferences

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Retrieval practice: the lack of transfer to deductive inferences
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13423-014-0646-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Randy Tran, Doug Rohrer, Harold Pashler

Abstract

Retrieval practice has been shown to enhance later recall of information reviewed through testing, whereas final-test measures involving making inferences from the learned information have produced mixed results. In four experiments, we examined whether the benefits of retrieval practice could transfer to deductive inferences. Participants studied a set of related premises and then reviewed these premises either by rereading or by taking fill-in-the-blank tests. As was expected, the testing condition produced better final-test recall of the premises. However, performance on multiple-choice inference questions showed no enhancement from retrieval practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 52%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 20%