↓ Skip to main content

Clinical, quality of life, and economic value of acromegaly disease control

Overview of attention for article published in Pituitary, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Clinical, quality of life, and economic value of acromegaly disease control
Published in
Pituitary, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11102-011-0310-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Ben-Shlomo, M. C. Sheppard, J. M. Stephens, S. Pulgar, S. Melmed

Abstract

Although acromegaly is a rare disease, the clinical, economic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) burden is considerable due to the broad spectrum of comorbidities as well as the need for lifelong management. We performed a comprehensive literature review of the past 12 years (1998-2010) to determine the benefit of disease control (defined as a growth hormone [GH] concentration <2.5 μg/l and insulin-like growth factor [IGF]-1 normal for age) on clinical, HRQoL, and economic outcomes. Increased GH and IGF-1 levels and low frequency of somatostatin analogue use directly predicted increased mortality risk. Clinical outcome measures that may improve with disease control include joint articular cartilage thickness, vertebral fractures, left ventricular function, exercise capacity and endurance, lipid profile, and obstructive apnea events. Some evidence suggests an association between controlled disease and improved HRQoL. Total direct treatment costs were higher for patients with uncontrolled compared to controlled disease. Costs incurred for management of comorbidities, and indirect cost could further add to treatment costs. Optimizing disease control in patients with acromegaly appears to improve outcomes. Future studies need to evaluate clinical outcomes, as well as HRQoL and comprehensive economic outcomes achieved with controlled disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 22%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 11 9%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Psychology 3 2%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,134,869
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Pituitary
#240
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,776
of 111,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pituitary
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them