↓ Skip to main content

Lessons from US Fossil Parks for Effective Informal Science Education

Overview of attention for article published in Geoheritage, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Lessons from US Fossil Parks for Effective Informal Science Education
Published in
Geoheritage, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12371-014-0116-x
Authors

Renee M. Clary, James H. Wandersee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 23%
Environmental Science 5 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,200,244
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Geoheritage
#71
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,612
of 227,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoheritage
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.