↓ Skip to main content

Is rock 'n' roll a symptom of baumol's disease?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cultural Economics, December 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Is rock 'n' roll a symptom of baumol's disease?
Published in
Journal of Cultural Economics, December 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00187744
Authors

Larry DeBoer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 <1%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 <1%
Lecturer 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 <1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Social Sciences 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,301,167
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cultural Economics
#196
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,198
of 42,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cultural Economics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them