| Title |
Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hernia, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10029-013-1108-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. E. Muysoms, E. B. Deerenberg, E. Peeters, F. Agresta, F. Berrevoet, G. Campanelli, W. Ceelen, G. G. Champault, F. Corcione, D. Cuccurullo, A. C. DeBeaux, U. A. Dietz, R. J. Fitzgibbons, J. F. Gillion, R.-D. Hilgers, J. Jeekel, I. Kyle-Leinhase, F. Köckerling, V. Mandala, A. Montgomery, S. Morales-Conde, R. K. J. Simmermacher, V. Schumpelick, M. Śmietański, M. Walgenbach, M. Miserez |
| Abstract |
The literature dealing with abdominal wall surgery is often flawed due to lack of adherence to accepted reporting standards and statistical methodology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Denmark | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 79% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,444,323
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#369
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,658
of 194,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.