↓ Skip to main content

Controls on Coarse Wood Decay in Temperate Tree Species: Birth of the LOGLIFE Experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Controls on Coarse Wood Decay in Temperate Tree Species: Birth of the LOGLIFE Experiment
Published in
Ambio, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13280-012-0304-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes H. C. Cornelissen, Ute Sass-Klaassen, Lourens Poorter, Koert van Geffen, Richard S. P. van Logtestijn, Jurgen van Hal, Leo Goudzwaard, Frank J. Sterck, René K. W. M. Klaassen, Grégoire T. Freschet, Annemieke van der Wal, Henk Eshuis, Juan Zuo, Wietse de Boer, Teun Lamers, Monique Weemstra, Vincent Cretin, Rozan Martin, Jan den Ouden, Matty P. Berg, Rien Aerts, Godefridus M. J. Mohren, Mariet M. Hefting

Abstract

Dead wood provides a huge terrestrial carbon stock and a habitat to wide-ranging organisms during its decay. Our brief review highlights that, in order to understand environmental change impacts on these functions, we need to quantify the contributions of different interacting biotic and abiotic drivers to wood decomposition. LOGLIFE is a new long-term 'common-garden' experiment to disentangle the effects of species' wood traits and site-related environmental drivers on wood decomposition dynamics and its associated diversity of microbial and invertebrate communities. This experiment is firmly rooted in pioneering experiments under the directorship of Terry Callaghan at Abisko Research Station, Sweden. LOGLIFE features two contrasting forest sites in the Netherlands, each hosting a similar set of coarse logs and branches of 10 tree species. LOGLIFE welcomes other researchers to test further questions concerning coarse wood decay that will also help to optimise forest management in view of carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 155 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 21%
Researcher 30 18%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 39%
Environmental Science 46 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 41 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,514,673
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#462
of 1,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,914
of 179,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.