You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Head-of-Bed Elevation Improves End-Expiratory Lung Volumes in Mechanically Ventilated Subjects: A Prospective Observational Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Care, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.4187/respcare.02733 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy J Spooner, Amanda Corley, Nicola A Sharpe, Adrian G Barnett, Lawrence R Caruana, Naomi E Hammond, John F Fraser |
| Abstract |
Head-of-bed elevation (HOBE) has been shown to assist in reducing respiratory complications associated with mechanical ventilation; however, there is minimal research describing changes in end-expiratory lung volume. This study aims to investigate changes in end-expiratory lung volume in a supine position and 2 levels of HOBE. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 29% |
| Mexico | 3 | 21% |
| Peru | 1 | 7% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,389,321
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Care
#459
of 2,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,259
of 227,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Care
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.