↓ Skip to main content

Domains of Core Competency, Standards, and Quality Assurance for Building Global Capacity in Health Promotion: The Galway Consensus Conference Statement

Overview of attention for article published in Health Education & Behavior, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Domains of Core Competency, Standards, and Quality Assurance for Building Global Capacity in Health Promotion: The Galway Consensus Conference Statement
Published in
Health Education & Behavior, May 2009
DOI 10.1177/1090198109333950
Pubmed ID
Authors

John P. Allegrante, Margaret M. Barry, Collins O. Airhihenbuwa, M. Elaine Auld, Janet L. Collins, Marie-Claude Lamarre, Gudjon Magnusson, David V. McQueen, Maurice B. Mittelmark, Galway Consensus Conference

Abstract

This paper reports the outcome of the Galway Consensus Conference, an effort undertaken as a first step toward international collaboration on credentialing in health promotion and health education. Twenty-nine leading authorities in health promotion, health education, and public health convened a 2-day meeting in Galway, Ireland, during which the available evidence on credentialing in health promotion was reviewed and discussed. Conference participants reached agreement on core values and principles, a common definition, and eight domains of core competency required to engage in effective health promotion practice. The domains of competency are catalyzing change, leadership, assessment, planning, implementation, evaluation, advocacy, and partnerships. The long-term aim of this work is to stimulate a global dialogue that will lead to the development and widespread adoption of standards and quality assurance systems in all countries to strengthen capacity in health promotion, a critical element in achieving goals for the improvement of global population health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 29 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2016.
All research outputs
#19,560,144
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Health Education & Behavior
#1,236
of 1,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,814
of 97,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Education & Behavior
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.