↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic and behavioural effects of sucrose and fructose/glucose drinks in the rat

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Metabolic and behavioural effects of sucrose and fructose/glucose drinks in the rat
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00394-011-0228-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anastasia Sheludiakova, Kieron Rooney, Robert A. Boakes

Abstract

Overconsumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, in particular carbonated soft drinks, promotes the development of overweight and obesity and is associated with metabolic disturbances, including intrahepatic fat accumulation and metabolic syndrome. One theory proposes that drinks sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup are particularly detrimental to health, as they contain fructose in its 'free' monosaccharide form. This experiment tested whether consuming 'free' fructose had a greater impact on body weight and metabolic abnormalities than when consumed 'bound' within the disaccharide sucrose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 127 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,134,869
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,578
of 2,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,281
of 119,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.