| Title |
A systematic review of different models of home and community care services for older persons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-93 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lee-Fay Low, Melvyn Yap, Henry Brodaty |
| Abstract |
Costs and consumer preference have led to a shift from the long-term institutional care of aged older people to home and community based care. The aim of this review is to evaluate the outcomes of case managed, integrated or consumer directed home and community care services for older persons, including those with dementia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 429 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 77 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 101 | 23% |
| Unknown | 76 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 80 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 75 | 17% |
| Psychology | 22 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 14% |
| Unknown | 88 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,208,122
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#333
of 8,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,711
of 121,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#5
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.